Lord of the Flies Essay

Throughout literature we claim calculaten different characters struggling with their inner injustice. That inner immorality can be brought out by a trigger incident or environment which drasti war cryy affects a characters nature. In the Lord of the Flies, being marooned on the island brings out the evil and savage side in the children. It is shown done their dis impress for social norms, merciless cleansings, and lastly turning on to each one other. In Lord of the Flies, the boys let out their inner beasts by showing no regard for social norms, unkind effaceings and turning on each other.At the beginning of the novel they did non nod off sight of social norms. As they view that they are alone on the island, no adults anywhere, they realize the brilliance of democracy and order in a place where there are no rules. I represent with Ralph. Weve got to have rules and obey them after entirely, were not savages (Golding, 47) This affirmation is utter by seaman, who is ad dressing the crowd of boys during an assembly. This statement shows that in the beginning before any talk of a beastie, they understood that they needed few order, some form of government that would provide them with safety and tools for survival.Jacks words later kindle teetotal because he is the one to disobey Ralph and turn his gage on the rules. By ignoring the rules and their government, he leaves the civilized kinship group to form a tribe with the demented rules of the wild. As the story unfolds, they slowly move away from their government. You see Ralph your conch doesnt work on this side of the island (Golding, 195). The symbol of their democracy is the talisman, the fragile, shining beauty of the shell. (Golding, 200) It was used to call together the boys to hold an assembly to discuss the troubling issues being made clear by Jacks hunters.When Jack says this, he proved that the hold of democracy is fading away as they became more than savage. Toward the end of the novel, the democracy is destroyed and nonexistent, and the conch is shattered. The conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist (Golding, 200). This moment is in truth symbolic because it represents the downfall of any sort of order among the children. Without any form of government the laws that had once utilize in their homeland, England, have no power on the island, and in turn use up to the boys encountering their inner evils by ignoring those laws.During the book we see that they develop a fascination and desire with blood and hunting which later lead to shameless killings. First, there is an attempt of killing a pig which drives Jack to hunt again You hump a pigs throat to let the blood out, said Jack, otherwise you cant eat the meat. Why didnt you? They knew very well why he hadnt because of the enormity of the prod descending and cutting into living flesh because of the unbearable blood. I was going to, said Jack. He was in the lead of them and t hey could not see his face. I was choosing a place. Next time Next time there would be no mercy. (Golding, 33-34) After this encounter with the pig, Jack was obsessed with hunting and killing this pig.When Jack and the group of hunters find a sow with her piglets, they are thrilled. This time it was for more than just food, their killing of this sow was brutish and vicious. It is describe the sow staggered her way ahead of them, bleeding and mad, and the hunters followed, wedded to her in lust, excited by the long drop behind and the dropped blood. The sow collapsed under them and they were heavy and fulfilled upon her. (Golding, 149) This sow was a symbol of an innocent being killed, she was a mother. She had children to look after, and the hunters deprived the piglets of their mother. The killing of Simon was done out of fear of the beast and in the darkness of the night. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. in that respect were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws. (Golding, 168)The imagery used in this chapter is that of an animal, by using teeth and claws to describe how cruel this killing was, showing that they have truly becoming animal like and savage. Through this event it seems as they call down more savage they become a little more afraid and desperate. The murder of neanderthal is not as violent as that of the sow and Simon. Piggy fell forty feet and landed on his back across hat square, red rock in the sea. His head opened and stuff came out and sour red. Piggys arms and legs twitched a bit, like a pigs after it was killed. (Golding, 200) Piggy was killed by Roger, who was throwing rocks, which knocked him off the cliff.The savage tribe ignored what Piggy had said about choosing sides, Which is better to be a pack of painted Indians like you are, or to be sensible like Ralph is. Which is better to have laws and agree, or to hunt and kill? (Go lding, 199) By Piggy saying this, it got Roger upset, because he had critized his chief and their tribe. When Roger was a trip of the civilized tribe, he conditioned his arm to shoot and miss Yet there was a place round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he Roger dare not throw.Here, invisible yet strong, was the tabu of the old life Rogers arm was conditioned by a acculturation that knew nothing of him and was in ruins. (Golding, 67) As he became more savage, he had lost the conditioning and the backup manraint he once had to hurt someone, which is shown through his actions. They were fearful, ignorant, and desperate and with that comes violence, they felt no remorse for their actions only pride and hatred. This also proved that through killing they let out their inner beast.In the beginning, they are not physically turning on each other, they used verbal abuse to belittle those who are younger or had no power. There are three groups of people who are frequently abused, the littluns, Piggy and Simon. Piggy was the major victim, Jack and the rest of the children would frequently name call him, tease him and laugh at him. Oh, shut up I got the conch, said Piggy, in a hurt voice. I got the right to speak (Golding, 49) they found him amusing, for they felt he utter of nonsense.Jack, as chief, decided to tie up Wilfred and beat him. Hes going to beat Wilfred. What for? I dont know. He didnt say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. Hes been-he giggled excitedly-hes been tied for hours, waiting-. For no apparent reason, Jack wanted to torture Wilfred, perhaps to reassert himself as chief and gain more followers. The last example of turning on each other in Lord of the Flies is the burning of the jungle to trap and kill Ralph. He swerved as a spear flew past and then was silent, running.All at once the lights flickering ahead of him merge together, the roar of the forest rose to thunder and a tall bush directly in his bridle-path bur st into a fan-shaped flame. (Golding, 220)In order to capture Ralph, Jack set the jungle alight to draw him out, and kill him. This is also an example of their want to hunt and kill, and in order to be rid of order and civilization Jack had to kill Ralph, but he had not succeed. In order to have peace among the children, they all needed to be supportive and understanding, but they were cruel and hurtful to each other.This proves that thought their consequential actions, that were two cruel and unusual, turning on one another allowed the children act savage and unleash their inner evil. In the novel Lord of the Flies the children discover their inner evil by forgetting social norms, senseless and remorseless killings and lastly by turning on each other. Thought a series of events the children show these qualities that prove once and for all that all people, young and old have the ability to be savage and evil. In this particular novel, these boys encounter their inner evil by the i nfluence of fear, ignorance, and desperation.