Should the U.S. Justice Department have filed suit against Arizona's Research Paper

Should the U.S. Justice Department have filed casing against genus Arizonas unseasoned immigration policy - Research Paper ExampleThe right focuses mainly on those provisions that use up state enforcement of federal immigration law and impose criminal penalties for immigration related conduct (Hing, p 169).The Arizonas new immigration policy has been signed as is scheduled to take pitch soon. Upon adoption, it will be officially illegal to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona. The police in Arizona will be expected to ask eachone to prove their immigration status. The Arizona police are in addition compelled, under threat of lawsuit, to enforce federal immigration laws. The law, according to the jurist department, will be big-ticket(prenominal) and disruptive. The law will further be susceptible to uneven application and can undermine club policing by discouraging cooperation with state and local law enforcement.There are negative consequences that will effect from giving th e local police the authority to stop anyone on the reasonable suspicion, that they just might be illegal immigrant. The law will automatically give the police an important new tool in their crime fighting process. The police will have the ability to detain and possibly deport any person without bothering to obtain warrants or prove that that the arrested individuals have committed a crime which is unconstitutional.The US justice department has filed a law suit seeking to challenge the Arizonas new immigration policy. The lawsuit charges that the Arizona law cracking down on illegal immigrants conflicts with the federal law. The Arizona law would disrupt immigration enforcement and can lead to police anguish of those who cannot prove their lawful status. The law suit has been filed in the federal court of Arizona and states that the Arizona states measure is unconstitutional and asks a judge to stop it from taking effect.The Arizona immigration law will cause the detention and haras sment of authorized visitors, immigrants, and citizens who do not have to carry